ST to RT Investigation Project

Table of Contents

Project Objective: Purpose

The purpose is to investigate and enact a CSCF/MFCF switch from ST to campus RT. There are three phases, planned to cover three terms: investigation (Spring 2016), implementing sample queues and staff dashboards for testers (Fall 2016), followed by staff training and implementing external access tools (Winter 2017). Each phase will include a "go/No-go" decision; if there are any dealbreakers, management will be notified ASAP.

Project Scope/Deliverables

The high-level outcomes and results of this project are as follows:
  • we're agreed on a project plan and timeline for the investigation
  • we've identified success criteria for being able to switch
  • we've investigated all identified factors
  • wrapup includes:
    • report to management so they can make a go/no-go decision (multiple reports along the way- informing about possible dealbreakers ASAP)
    • plans for potential upcoming work

Scope Includes/Excludes

Includes

  • investigation includes coordination with IST on process for RT improvements
    • to be coded by CSCF, MFCF, other
  • making available necessary documentation

Excludes

  • existing requests in ST will not move

Constraints

  • having an effective request-tracking system is critical to CSCF and MFCF workflows. We won't move until and unless necessary workflows are available.

Assumptions and Risks

  • we can identify all of the critical features of ST by testing RT with sample requests- without leaving out seldom-used features that we later discover were critical.

Project Members

drallen (project manager), fhgunn, lfolland, rblanders

Project Stakeholders

CSCF, MFCF, and our clients

Project Sponsor

Ken Salem

ST

Implementation Plan

  • 2016-05 - 2016-08: investigation phase. DONE
    • 2016-06: Survey of CSCF/MFCF for important features DONE
    • 2016-08: Team finishes report on critical and important features DONE
    • 2016-08: Go forward decision leading to: DONE
  • 2016-09 - 2016-12: decisions leading to setting up sample queues, access, support-staff dashboards.
    • 2016-09: IST sets up additional access for project members DONE
    • 2016-10: CSCF Management decides on initial queues to set up (Research Groups plus Management?)
    • 2016-10: MFCF Management decides on initial queues to set up (?)
    • 2016-10: IST sets up sample queues (Maybe not necessary yet? We have mfcf-test queue.)
    • 2016-10: Team asks IST/Lisa for customizations to queues, such as "all queue members have access to all items", adding summary field, etc.
    • 2016-11: Team sets up dashboards
    • 2016-11: Team meets with ISTers (suggested by Lisa?) to see their regular workflow
    • 2016-11: Team identifies possible changes in our workflow
    • 2016-11: Team identifies specific requirements of external access tools - including flagging problematic/difficult requirements
    • 2016-12: Team reports to CSCF Management
    • 2016-12: Go forward decision leading to:
  • 2017-01 - 2017-04: staff training, get all external access tools working
    • 2017-01: Team + co-op employee begin implementing external access tools
    • 2017-02: Completion of tools to replace ST functionality not included in RT (or workarounds)
    • 2017-02: Beginning training of staff / team identifies remaining deficiencies STToRTInvestigation Staff Meeting Presentation 2017 02 16
    • 2017-04: Deficiencies are either mitigated or we decide we have dealbreakers
    • 2017-04: Training by IST
    • 2017-04: ST To RT Documentation is started and a working version is available for staff
    • 2017-04: Go forward decision leading to:
  • 2017-05: all new requests handled by campus RT. ST remains in maintenance mode, for historic data.

Meeting notes

-- DanielAllen - 2016-05-31

Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r29 < r28 < r27 < r26 < r25 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r29 - 2017-05-23 - DanielAllen
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright © 2008-2019 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback