Course Description:
CS 100: Introduction to Computing through Applications
Using personal computers as effective problem solving tools for the present and the future. Effective use of spreadsheets to process, manipulate, and visualize numeric and textual information. Introduction to the Internet, World Wide Web, HTML, and XML. Algorithms underlying the functional components of web search engines and their influence on data access. Using wikis to publish, reshape, and organize data collaboratively.
Dave's Comments:
This term was originally suppsed to be a leisurely term where I was solely teaching CS 100 and I could focus on completing the videos for the course.

Instead, I took on three additional sections of CS 136, which significantly increased my workload. While I continued to produce a few new videos for the course, I did not complete all of the videos I had planned.

Unfortunately, they continued to use the same Math Faculty evaluations that they use for in-class courses.
Teaching Evaluations:
Number of Respondents: 117 / 358 (33%)
Characteristics of the Instructor:
Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures.
ExcellentGoodSatisfactoryUnsatisfactoryVery poorNo opinion
51491114
44%42%9%1%3%
At what level were the instructor's explanations aimed?
Too highSomewhat too highJust rightSomewhat too lowToo lowNo opinion
41687423
3%14%75%3%2%3%
Evaluate the instructor's treatment of students' questions.
ExcellentGoodSatisfactoryUnsatisfactoryVery poorNo opinion
2440172126
22%36%15%2%1%24%
Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor's visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.).
ExcellentGoodSatisfactoryUnsatisfactoryVery poorNo opinion
384817318
33%42%15%3%1%7%
Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor's oral presentation.
ExcellentGoodSatisfactoryUnsatisfactoryVery poorNo opinion
46461027
41%41%9%2%6%
Was the instructor available for help outside of class?
AlwaysMost of the timeOften enoughNot often enoughNeverI did not seek help
1711164261
15%10%14%4%2%55%
Did you find the course interesting?
Very InterestingInterestingNot interestingNo opinion
386882
33%59%7%2%
Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher.
ExcellentGoodSatisfactoryUnsatisfactoryVery poorNo opinion
42559224
37%48%8%2%2%4%
Characteristics of the Course:
What proportion of lectures did you attend in this course?
90-100%75-90%50-75%25-50%< 25%
90422
92%4%2%2%
Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc.) helpful in learning the course content?
Very helpfulHelpfulNot helpfulNo work assignedNo opinion
5555312
47%47%3%1%2%
Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?
Very helpfulHelpfulNot helpfulNo printed course notesNo opinion
282433319
26%22%3%31%18%
Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?
Very helpfulHelpfulNot helpfulNo text requiredNo opinion
8626823
7%6%2%64%21%
Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?
Too muchSomewhat too muchOkaySomewhat too littleToo littleNo opinion
41394132
3%11%80%1%3%2%
Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?
Too muchSomewhat too muchOkaySomewhat too littleToo littleNo opinion
6188921
5%16%77%2%1%
On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?
0-2 hours3-6 hours7-10 hours11-15 hours> 15 hours
178218
15%70%15%
Question-Specific Comments:
At what level were the instructor's explanations aimed?
Evaluate the instructor's treatment of students' questions.
Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructor's oral presentation.
Was the instructor available for help outside of class?
What proportion of lectures did you attend in this course?
Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc.) helpful in learning the course content?
Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?
Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?
On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?
Comments:
Note: This is a complete list of comments I received, listed alphabetically to avoid bias.
Please mention anything that you feel the instructor has done well in this course.
Please make constructive comments about anything in the instructor's technique or style that could, in your opinion, be improved.
What were the strong points of the course?
What were the weak points of the course?
Was the class atmosphere affected either positively or negatively by attitudes of the instructor or students, e.g., with respect to gender, race, ability, appearance? Please explain.
Any other comments, e.g., class size, suitability of room, noise level, etc.
All of the data for this page is available in the github repository: https://github.com/dtompkins/teacheval