·  Berry D. M., Lucena M., Sakhnini, V., and Dhakla A., (2023). Scope Determined (D) and Scope Determining (G)Requirements: A New Categorization of Functional Requirements. REFSQ 2023.

·  Mich, L., Sakhnini, V., and Berry, D. M. (2023). To Group or Not to Group? Group Sizes for Requirements Elicitation. Information and Software Technology, Volume 160

 

·  Mich, L., Sakhnini, V., and Berry, D. M. (2023). To Group or Not to Group? Group Sizes for Requirements Elicitation. Technical report. MSB_JSSpaper.

·  Berry, D. M., Lucena, M., Sakhnini, V., Dhakla, A. (2023). Scope determined (d) versus scope determining (g) requirements: A new significant categorization of functional requirements. Tech. rep., Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~dberry/FTP_SITE/tech.reports/GvsDprelimTechReport.pdf

·  Mich, L., Sakhnini, V., and Berry, D. M. (2017). Downsizing EPMcreate to Lighter Creativity Techniques for Requirements Elicitation. REFSQ Workshops 2017

·  Sakhnini, V., Mich, L., and Berry, D. M. (2017). Group versus individual use of power-only EPMcreate as a creativity enhancement technique for requirements elicitation. Empirical Software Engineering. Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 2001-2049

·  Sakhnini, V., Mich, L., and Berry, D. M. (2016). Materials for Comparing POEPMcreate, EPMcreate, and Brainstorming. Technical report, School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo. http://se.uwaterloo.ca/~dberry/FTP_SITE/ software.distribution/EPMcreateExperimentMaterials/.

·  Sakhnini, V., Mich, L., and Berry, D. M. (2016). Group Versus Individual Use of an Optimized and the Full EPMcreate as Creativity Enhancement Techniques for Web Site Requirements Elicitation. Technical report, School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo. http://se.uwaterloo.ca/~dberry/FTP_SITE/ tech.reports/SakhniniMichBerryTR.pdf.

·  Mich, L., Sakhnini, V., and Berry, D. M. (2015). “Requirements Elicitation (ReqElic) in My Company”, Requirements Engineering Magazine, Issue 2015-03: Thinking without limits. http://re-magazine.ireb.org/issues/2015-3-thinking-without-limits/requirements-elicitation/

·  Sakhnini, V., Mich, L., and Berry, D. M. (2013). “On the Sizes of Groups Using the Full and Optimized EPMcreate Creativity Enhancement Technique for Web Site Requirements Elicitation”, CreaRE workshop, REFSQ 2013, Essen, Germany.

·  Mich, L., Berry, D.M., and Sakhnini, V. (2012). “Applying Creativity Techniques to Requirements Elicitation: Defining an Enhanced EPMCreate”, Empirical Research Fair, REFSQ 2012, Essen, Germany.

·  Sakhnini, V., Mich, L., and Berry, D. M. (2012). “The Effectiveness of an Optimized EPMcreate as a Creativity Enhancement Technique for Website Requirements Elicitation”, Requirements Engineering Journal, 17:3, pp. 171–186.

·  Sakhnini, V., Berry, D.M., and Mich, L. (2010). “Validation of the Effectiveness of an Optimized EPMcreate as an Aid for Creative Requirements Elicitation”, Proceedings of 16th International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ), pp. 91–105, Essen, Germany.

·  Sakhnini, V. and Hazzan, O. (2008). “Reducing Abstraction in High School Computer Science Education: The Case of Definition, Implementation and Use of Abstract Data Types”, ACM Journal on Education Resources in Computing, 8:2, pp. 5:1–5:13. (ACM version)

·  Hazzan, O., Dubinsky, Y., Eidelman, L., Sakhnini, V. and Teif, M. (2006). “Qualitative Research in Computer Science Education”. Proceedings of the 37th Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE),Houston, Texas, USA. pp. 408–412. (ACM version)

·  Sakhnini, V. (2005). “Reducing Abstraction in High School Computer Science Education: The Case of Definition, Implementation and Use of Abstract Data Types”, PhD Thesis, Department of Education in Technology and Science, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. (Abstract)