· Berry
D. M., Lucena M., Sakhnini, V., and Dhakla A., (2023). Scope Determined (D) and Scope Determining (G)Requirements:
A New Categorization of Functional Requirements. REFSQ 2023.
·
Mich, L., Sakhnini, V., and
Berry, D. M. (2023). To Group or Not to Group? Group Sizes for Requirements
Elicitation. Information and Software Technology, Volume 160
·
Mich, L., Sakhnini, V., and
Berry, D. M. (2023). To Group or Not to Group? Group Sizes for Requirements
Elicitation. Technical report. MSB_JSSpaper.
·
Berry, D. M., Lucena, M.,
Sakhnini, V., Dhakla, A. (2023). Scope determined (d) versus scope determining
(g) requirements: A new significant categorization of functional requirements.
Tech. rep., Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~dberry/FTP_SITE/tech.reports/GvsDprelimTechReport.pdf
·
Mich, L., Sakhnini, V., and
Berry, D. M. (2017). Downsizing EPMcreate to Lighter Creativity Techniques for
Requirements Elicitation. REFSQ Workshops 2017
·
Sakhnini, V., Mich, L., and
Berry, D. M. (2017). Group versus individual use of power-only EPMcreate as a
creativity enhancement technique for requirements elicitation. Empirical
Software Engineering. Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 2001-2049
·
Sakhnini, V., Mich, L., and
Berry, D. M. (2016). Materials for Comparing POEPMcreate, EPMcreate, and
Brainstorming. Technical report, School of Computer Science, University of
Waterloo. http://se.uwaterloo.ca/~dberry/FTP_SITE/
software.distribution/EPMcreateExperimentMaterials/.
·
Sakhnini, V., Mich, L., and
Berry, D. M. (2016). Group Versus Individual Use of an Optimized and the Full
EPMcreate as Creativity Enhancement Techniques for Web Site Requirements
Elicitation. Technical report, School of Computer Science, University of
Waterloo. http://se.uwaterloo.ca/~dberry/FTP_SITE/
tech.reports/SakhniniMichBerryTR.pdf.
·
Mich, L., Sakhnini, V., and
Berry, D. M. (2015). “Requirements Elicitation (ReqElic) in My Company”,
Requirements Engineering Magazine, Issue 2015-03: Thinking without limits. http://re-magazine.ireb.org/issues/2015-3-thinking-without-limits/requirements-elicitation/
·
Sakhnini, V., Mich, L., and
Berry, D. M. (2013). “On the Sizes of Groups Using the Full and Optimized
EPMcreate Creativity Enhancement Technique for Web Site Requirements
Elicitation”, CreaRE workshop, REFSQ 2013, Essen, Germany.
·
Mich, L., Berry, D.M., and
Sakhnini, V. (2012). “Applying Creativity Techniques to Requirements
Elicitation: Defining an Enhanced EPMCreate”, Empirical Research Fair, REFSQ
2012, Essen, Germany.
·
Sakhnini, V., Mich, L., and
Berry, D. M. (2012). “The Effectiveness of an Optimized EPMcreate as a
Creativity Enhancement Technique for Website Requirements Elicitation”,
Requirements Engineering Journal, 17:3, pp. 171–186.
·
Sakhnini, V., Berry, D.M.,
and Mich, L. (2010). “Validation of the Effectiveness of an Optimized EPMcreate
as an Aid for Creative Requirements Elicitation”, Proceedings of 16th
International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for
Software Quality (REFSQ), pp. 91–105, Essen, Germany.
·
Sakhnini, V. and Hazzan, O.
(2008). “Reducing Abstraction in High School Computer Science Education: The
Case of Definition, Implementation and Use of Abstract Data Types”, ACM Journal
on Education Resources in Computing, 8:2, pp. 5:1–5:13. (ACM version)
·
Hazzan, O., Dubinsky, Y.,
Eidelman, L., Sakhnini, V. and Teif, M. (2006). “Qualitative Research in
Computer Science Education”. Proceedings of the 37th Technical Symposium on
Computer Science Education (SIGCSE),Houston, Texas, USA. pp. 408–412. (ACM version)
·
Sakhnini, V. (2005).
“Reducing Abstraction in High School Computer Science Education: The Case of
Definition, Implementation and Use of Abstract Data Types”, PhD Thesis, Department
of Education in Technology and Science, Technion–Israel Institute of
Technology, Haifa, Israel. (Abstract)