Date |
Assigned Readings |
Slides |
May 6th | None | Slides Screen Cast |
May 8th | None | No Class |
May 13th | Read the papers below and post commentary as indicated in the slides posted for lecture 1 above. | Slides|
May 15th | See Readings from last class |
Slides Screen Cast |
May 22nd | Read the papers below and post commentary as indicated in the slides posted for lecture 1 above. | Slides|
May 27th | Read the papers below and post commentary as indicated in the slides posted for lecture 1 above. | |
June 3th | Read the papers below and post commentary as indicated in the slides posted for lecture 1 above. | |
June 10 | Read the papers below and post commentary as indicated in the slides posted for lecture 1 above. |
Find 2 friends per group member and ask them to type four different paragraphs as follows:
Calculate typing speed in words per minute (where 1 word = 5 characters) and error rate ((word errors)/(total words) * 100) for each of the devices and languages. Enter these values into a Google Spreadsheet (posted next week).
Log into the TCPS2 tutorial via the University of Waterloo Office of Research Ethics website. Complete the tutorial and email your completion certificate to me by Wednesday, May 29th.
Your goal is to examine profiles on the popular professor rating website rate my professor. Select four professors from the university of Waterloo, but NOT from computer science, two male and two female professors. Anonymize both professor identity and poster identity. Select at least 5 comments for each professor, yielding 20 comments. Code these comments. Look for themes that correlate with quality. Also note any instances of commentary on appearance, dress, sexism, or other issues that crop up in your comments as harvested. To submit, perform an intial qualitative analysis to group by themes. Present those themes on two or three slides (total) with some example statements quoted from slides to justify your analysis of categories.
Between June 19th and June 24th, pick two projects in the class to comment on. Project comments are first-come. Maximum of three commentators for each project. The goal of these comments should be to make suggestions and improve other projects in the class. Think carefully before posting, write the comment to yourself first, and reread your comment to make sure it is constructive. Ask yourself:
There is a technique to making constructive suggestions. Always start with what you like, what is positive. Then, when you move to constructive suggestions or gaps that you see, the idea is to phrase any suggestions as suggestions: "I was wondering if you had considered whether ...". Also, asking for additional information or something to be expanded upon can also be phrased in the personal: "I didn't exactly understand how you were ...". If you start with what you like, and then phrase suggestions and requests for detail in the personal, it difuses tension because it doesn't point out what is wrong with something proposed, but instead with what you don't understand.
Project recruiting materials have been posted here.
July 22, 24, you will have a chance to present your final project. Think of this like a 15 minute conference talk with 5 minutes for questions. Please sign up for a presentation slot here.
August 10th, final project write-ups are due.