1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:04,200 Hello everyone. So in this video, I'd like to prove the following proposition. 2 00:00:04,200 --> 00:00:08,733 I didn't prove this in class, 
but I alluded to its truth. 3 00:00:08,733 --> 00:00:11,466 Now I'll actually 
demonstrate it. 4 00:00:11,466 --> 00:00:17,366 So d divides a and d divides b
then d divides the gcd of a and b 5 00:00:17,366 --> 00:00:17,933 6 00:00:17,933 --> 00:00:21,933 It's perhaps kind of tough to 
know where to start; it really is. 7 00:00:21,933 --> 00:00:25,200 d divides a and d divides b 
doesn't really tell us too much, 8 00:00:25,200 --> 00:00:27,366 Right? We need to use 
something about the gcd here 9 00:00:27,366 --> 00:00:31,100 in order to get the last division. 
So we're gonna start with the gcd. 10 00:00:31,100 --> 00:00:33,466 11 00:00:33,466 --> 00:00:38,500 I usually write a letter for the 
gcd, just to make my life easier, 12 00:00:38,500 --> 00:00:41,400 and so that I don't have to 
write gcd a hundred times. 13 00:00:41,400 --> 00:00:45,800 So let e equal the 
gcd of a and b. 14 00:00:45,800 --> 00:00:47,266 Now what am I gonna do? Well, 15 00:00:47,266 --> 00:00:49,766 we have some hammers from 
class, so let's try to use one, 16 00:00:49,766 --> 00:00:53,166 and the one I'm going to use is 
Bezout's Lemma, so the back substitution. 17 00:00:53,166 --> 00:00:56,666 "By Bezout's Lemma, 18 00:00:56,666 --> 00:01:03,633 we know there exist
integers x and y 19 00:01:03,633 --> 00:01:09,633 such that: 20 00:01:09,633 --> 00:01:12,966 e is equal to a x plus b y." 21 00:01:12,966 --> 00:01:13,000 22 00:01:13,000 --> 00:01:15,033 Alright so that's what 
Bezout's Lemma says. 23 00:01:15,033 --> 00:01:17,900 It says that you can write the gcd 
as a linear combination of a and b. 24 00:01:17,900 --> 00:01:22,400 Okay, so now with this hammer in 
place, the proof is in good shape. 25 00:01:22,400 --> 00:01:24,166 So now, let's actually use the hypothesis, 26 00:01:24,166 --> 00:01:26,400 which is d divides a and d divides b. 27 00:01:26,400 --> 00:01:33,900 Since d divides a and d divides b, 28 00:01:33,900 --> 00:01:40,100 by divisibility of 
integer combinations, 29 00:01:40,100 --> 00:01:42,333 we have... 30 00:01:42,333 --> 00:01:47,833 d divides...let's take a good linear combination of a and b, 31 00:01:47,833 --> 00:01:50,966 and the ones that we should do 
is the x and y linear combination 32 00:01:50,966 --> 00:01:53,833 a x plus b y and that's equal to e. 33 00:01:53,833 --> 00:01:57,833 Since e was equal to 
the gcd of a and b, 34 00:01:57,833 --> 00:02:00,833 we're actually done. 35 00:02:00,833 --> 00:02:04,833 Thus... let's see 
this in action… 36 00:02:04,833 --> 00:02:09,566 so, d divides a x plus b y and a x plus 
b y is e which is the gcd of a and b. 37 00:02:09,566 --> 00:02:14,533 So thus, d divides 38 00:02:14,533 --> 00:02:17,633 the gcd of 
a and b. 39 00:02:17,633 --> 00:02:20,833 And that's it. 40 00:02:20,833 --> 00:02:24,833 A quick little theorem here. 41 00:02:24,833 --> 00:02:26,666 So here we didn't have to use too too much but, 42 00:02:26,666 --> 00:02:29,400 we did use a combination of some 
of the hammers that we have: 43 00:02:29,400 --> 00:02:32,366 Bezout's Lemma and divisibility of integer combinations. 44 00:02:32,366 --> 00:02:34,933 Those two things combined, 
take us home in this problem. 45 00:02:34,933 --> 00:02:37,633 So again, it's tough to know where 
to start in a problem like this. 46 00:02:37,633 --> 00:02:40,733 Again sometimes it helps to 
look at the conclusion, 47 00:02:40,733 --> 00:02:42,533 sometimes it doesn't, it really just depends. 48 00:02:42,533 --> 00:02:45,433 But here since we want d 
divides the gcd of a and b, 49 00:02:45,433 --> 00:02:48,366 it makes sense to try to do 
something with the gcd of a and b, 50 00:02:48,366 --> 00:02:50,733 and what can we do? Well, back substitution 51 00:02:50,733 --> 00:02:52,366 or Bezout's Lemma or whatever you want to call it, 52 00:02:52,366 --> 00:02:56,366 that gives us integers x and y; we 
can get the ball rolling with that. 53 00:02:56,366 --> 00:03:00,033 Hopefully this has 
been enlightening. 54 00:03:00,033 --> 00:03:02,533 Thank you very much for your time. Good luck.