%-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
%
% CS 888, Winter 2016
% Template for CS 888 Paper reviews
%
% Originally created by Craig S. Kaplan
% Modified by Christopher Batty
%
% Some tips:
%
%  * Don't use latex/dvips/pstopdf.  That's old news.  Just use
%    the newer pdflatex to go from .tex directly to .pdf.
%
%
% -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

\documentclass[10pt,letterpaper]{article}

\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0in}
\setlength{\topmargin}{0.0in}
\setlength{\textheight}{9in}
\setlength{\textwidth}{6.5in}
\setlength{\parindent}{3.0em}
\setlength{\headheight}{0in}
\setlength{\headsep}{0in}
\setlength{\footskip}{0in}

\setlength{\parskip}{1ex}
\setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{1ex}

\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{times}
\usepackage{url}
\usepackage{bibentry}

\newcommand{\Name}{Replace With Your Name}
\newcommand{\Title}{Replace With Paper Title}
\begin{document}

\thispagestyle{empty}
\nobibliography{papers_full}

\noindent
\parbox{4.5in}{\Large\textbf{\Title}}
\hfill
\parbox{1.5in}{\begin{flushright}\textbf{\Name}\end{flushright}}

\begin{center}\line(1,0){400} \\\end{center}

%Fill in your review below

\noindent \textbf{Description:}
%Briefly describe the paper and its contribution to computer graphics and interactive techniques. Please give your assessment of the scope and magnitude of the paper's contribution.

Fill in text here.

\noindent \textbf{Clarity of Exposition:}
%Is the exposition clear? How could it be improved?

Fill in text here.

\noindent \textbf{Quality of References:}
%Are the references adequate? List any additional references that are needed.

Fill in text here.

\noindent \textbf{Reproducibility:}
%Could the work be reproduced from the information in the paper? Was any code or data submitted with the supplemental materials? If so, does it support the claims in the paper? Are all important algorithmic or system details discussed adequately in the paper?

Fill in text here.

\noindent \textbf{Rating (Continuous 1-5 scale):}
%Please rate this paper on a continuous scale from 1 to 5, where:

%1 = Definitely reject. I would protest strongly if it's accepted.
%2 = Probably reject. I would argue against this paper.
%3 = Possibly accept, but only if others champion it.
%4 = Probably accept. I would argue for this paper.
%5 = Definitely accept. I would protest strongly if it's not accepted.

\noindent \textbf{Explanation of Rating:}
%Explain your rating by discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the submission, contributions, and the potential impact of the paper.  Include suggestions for improvement and publication alternatives, if appropriate. Be thorough. Be fair. Be courteous. Your evaluation will be forwarded to the authors during the rebuttal period.

Fill in text here.

\end{document}