==+== CS854-Fall-2021 Review Form ==-== DO NOT CHANGE LINES THAT START WITH "==+==" OR "==*==". ==-== For further guidance, or to upload this file when you are done, go to: ==-== https://uw-cs854-perf21.hotcrp.com/offline ==+== ===================================================================== ==+== Begin Review ==+== Reviewer: Tim Brecht ==+== Paper Number (Enter paper number here) ==+== Review Readiness ==-== Enter "Ready" if the review is ready for others to see: Ready ==*== Overall merit ==-== Choices: ==-== 1. Reject ==-== 2. Weak reject ==-== 3. Weak accept ==-== 4. Accept ==-== 5. Strong accept ==-== Enter the number of your choice: (Your choice here) ==*== Writing Quality ==-== Choices: ==-== 1. Unacceptable ==-== 2. Needs improvement ==-== 3. Adequate ==-== 4. Well-written ==-== 5. Outstanding ==-== Enter the number of your choice: (Your choice here) ==*== Reviewer Expertise and/or Confidence ==-== At some conferences these could be separate fields (Expertise and ==-== Confidence). I've blended them here because typically students ==-== don't have much expertise for many of the class projects ==-== Choices: ==-== 1. No familiarity (No confidence whatsoever) ==-== 2. Some familiarity (Somewhat confident) ==-== 3. Knowledgeable (Quite Confident) ==-== 4. Expert (Highly Confident) ==-== Enter the number of your choice: (Your choice here) ==*== Paper summary ==-== (1-2 sentences) ==-== Markdown styling and LaTeX math supported. ==*== Strengths ==-== What are the paper’s important strengths? Just a couple of ==-== sentences, please. ==-== Markdown styling and LaTeX math supported. ==*== Weaknesses ==-== What are the paper’s important weaknesses? Just a couple ==-== sentences, please. ==-== Markdown styling and LaTeX math supported. ==*== Given the Strengths and Weaknesses, Justify your Decision for Overall ==*== Merit ==-== Briefly justify why you think the paper should be accepted or ==-== rejected. ==-== Markdown styling and LaTeX math supported. ==*== Comments to authors ==-== Provide any additional information that would be useful to the ==-== authors that you haven't already(e.g., things that could be ==-== improved that you haven't already described). ==-== Markdown styling and LaTeX math supported. ==*== Overall Merit as a Course Project ==-== (hidden from authors) ==-== For a course project I would rate this paper as ==-== Choices: ==-== 1. Unacceptable ==-== 2. Poor ==-== 3. Average ==-== 4. Good ==-== 5. Excellent ==-== Enter the number of your choice: (Your choice here) ==*== Comments for PC (optional) ==-== (hidden from authors) ==-== This field is communicating things to the PC that you might not ==-== want to the authors to see. ==-== Markdown styling and LaTeX math supported. ==+== Scratchpad (for unsaved private notes) ==+== End Review