Documents on Mexican Politics.


    Global Exchange Report on State Electoral Processes in Michoacan, Mexico
globalexch@igc.apc.org
    November, 1995

     by: Jesus Martinez, Professor of Political Science, Santa Clara University
     and Ted Lewis, Mexico program director, Global Exchange

    (Preliminary election results can be found at the end of this report.
Final
    results will be sent out as they become available.)


                On November 12, state elections for governor, state deputies,
    and local mayors were held in Michoacan. Simultaneously elections were
    held for state deputies and mayoralties in the states of Oaxaca, Puebla,
    Sinaloa and Tamaulipus. Additionally, elections for Citizens Councils were
    held in Mexico City. Overall, a combined total of 13,645,117 people were
    eligible to vote in elections that took place in a context of national
    political and economic crisis.

        Because Michoacan held the nation's only gubernatorial election and
    because of a recent history of electoral fraud and repressive
    political violence it received the most scrutiny, much of it from recently
    formed civic organizations.  Froylan Corro of the Alianza Civica of
    Michoacan estimated that statewide 1,500 to 2,000 Michoacanos
    participated in some form of independent elections observation. 680
    observers officially registered with the State Electoral Commission (IEE).
    The groups that registered the most observers were Alianza Civica de
    Michoacan, the Grupo de Observadores Unidos por la Paz - "Siervos de la
    Nacion", and the Union de Observadores Electorales de Michoacan, A.C.
    Of these groups, Alianza Civica is the only group with a nationwide
    presence.

     Alianza Civica

        Alianza Civica is an independent and non-partisan coalition of more
    than 400 non-governmental and civic organizations from throughout
    Mexico. It was originally formed to provide civic observation of the 1994
    presidential elections. Since then Alianza has been involved in observing
    and reporting on state and local elections throughout Mexico.  Alianza
    Civica has also carried out an ongoing campaign of civic education and
    organized three grassroots referendums on important national questions
    during 1995.

        During the November 12 balloting, Alianza Civica organized
    observations in the states of Michoacan, Oaxaca, Puebla, and Tlaxcala.
    Global Exchange was present at the invitation of Alianza Civica to organize
    a delegation to support the observation in Michoacan and to disseminate
    information about the election internationally.

    Global Exchange

        Global Exchange is US based non-profit which has sent non-
    governmental elections observers and human rights delegations to many
    countries to assist non-governmental civic and human rights organizations
    that request our presence.  Global Exchange sent a delegation of 115 to
    support Alianza Civica in the August 1994 presidential election in Mexico
    and had a presence during the recent municipal elections in Chiapas.
Global
    Exchange has also sent elections monitors to El Salvador, South Africa,
    Haiti, and Guatemala.

    Participants in this delegation were Ted Lewis, Global Exchange Mexico
    program director; Jesus Martinez, Professor of Political Science at Santa
    Clara University; Eric Olsen, Mexico program director of the Washington
    Office on Latin America (WOLA); John Tinker, computer engineer; and
    Cecilia Sanchez, director of communications for the (Mexican) Citizens
    Democracy Movement (MCD).

    Context

        The Michoacan elections take place in a context marked by eight
    years of severe political conflict during which eight elections have been
    called into question and post electoral conflict has erupted repeatedly.
    Political assassinations of opposition activists, demonstrations, and
sit-ins
    have been common and have contributed to social and economic instability
    in Michoacan.

        In an effort to bring tranquillity to the electoral process this years,
    the political parties agreed to adopt a new electoral code which gave a far
    larger role to citizens in the electoral process.  Opposition party
    representatives agreed that the new electoral code was a significant
step in
    the direction of fairness, but that through political maneuvering the
PRI had
    maintained unbalance influence in the new citizen based structures.
    Representatives of all the parties noted that political violence was
virtually
    absent during the three month campaign - an achievement that was sullied
    when four PRD activists were shot or otherwise injured on the elections
    eve.  Additionally, representatives from both the left-center
opposition Party
    of the Democratic Revolution (PRD) and the conservative Party of National
    Action (PAN) expressed concern about several structures they see as
    favoring the long hold of the ruling Party of the Institutional Revolution
    (PRI).

        The most consistent concerns were  1) high campaign spending
    limits and the absence of structures to independently verify the self-
    generated spending reports of the parties. 2) The continuing use of public
    funds as a means to generate support for the ruling PRI and 3) a
    pronounced bias in the print and electronic media in favor of the PRI.

        Felipe Calderon, the gubernatorial candidate of the PAN and
    Antonio Soto, the State President of the PRD both expressed concern to our
    group that the statutory limit of 28,000,000 new pesos for each party's
    campaign was excessive.  They also expressed suspicion that the PRI had
    spent beyond even this limit and lamented their inability to legally
challenge
    the summary campaign report the PRI is obligated to submit to the IEE.
    Both opposition parties said they would voluntarily submit their spending
    records to an independent audit.  Jaime Bravo Ramirez, Secretary for
    Organization of the state PRI denied that his party had overspent and
    impugned the objectivity of La Jornada reporter Rosa Icela Rodriguez who
    had reported on the apparent lavish spending on bands, transportation and
    gifts in the PRI's closing campaign rally.  He also said that he considered
    the submission of a report to the IEE to be a sufficient level of reporting.

        The use of public funds to support the electoral goals of the ruling
    party is an entrenched tradition in Michoacan and Mexico in general.
In this
    case the use of PROCAMPO (agricultural subsidy) funds to support the PRI
    candidates was alleged.  Both PAN and PRD representatives contended that
    despite repeated requests that PROCAMPO subsidies be entirely distributed
    prior to the election, only thirty percent of the funds had been so
disbursed.
    Jorge Manzanera, National Director of Electoral Processes for the PAN
    pointed out that funds in question are designated to support the planting
    cycle and have not been delivered despite the fact that it is nearly
harvest
    time.  Jaime Bravo of the PRI denied that any use of funds for electoral
    purposes was taking place.

        Biased media coverage was also an impediment to fairness in the
    election.  A carefully documented study carried out by the Alianza Civica
    demonstrates that the PRI receives the most attention and favorable
    treatment from the print and electronic media.  The Voz de Michoacan, the
    largest circulation daily in the state devoted 89 percent of its
articles dealing
    with the governors race to the PRI candidate.  The PRD candidate was
    mentioned eight percent of the time and the PAN candidate only three
    percent of the time; and when they were mentioned it was usually in an
    unfavorable light.  This pattern was generalized among most of the states'
    newspapers.  The Alianza Civica study also revealed television and radio
    coverage consistently favored the PRI in terms of amount and content of
    coverage.

        Finally, there is the issue of impunity.  As Marta Perez, Executive
    Secretary of the Alianza Civica made clear, there is little fear of
prosecution
    among those intent on committing electoral crimes. Despite years of
    frequently blatant fraud throughout the country there are no electoral
    delinquents.  Not a single individual has ever been found guilty of
elections
    fraud.

     The Actors

                Although this brief section focuses on the three main
parties and
    their gubernatorial candidates, it is important to emphasize that
    analyses of electoral processes in Michoacan require us to consider
    the electorate itself as well as governmental institutions and offices, the
    private sector, the mass media, NGOs, and research-oriented
    institutions such as the University of Guadalajara.

                Since 1988, elections in Michoacan have been characterized
by the
    conflictive struggle between the PRI and PRD.  Today it is clear that
    the PAN is also an attractive option to the voters of the state.

                Despite the significance of the political parties, analysts have
    also called attention to the concentration of power in groups that are
    currently beyond the control of voters. Control of the political
    system in Michoacan has resided in the hands of a political group
    headed by former governor Carlos Torres Manzo.  With the exception of
    Cuauhtemoc Cardenas, who governed in the early eighties, the Torres
    Manzo group has remained the hegemonic force in the entity, imposing
    its candidates and agenda via the PRI.  They have been unwilling to give up
    power, continue to engage in electoral fraud, and even disobey instructions
    from national leaders of their own party.  This has led to a widely held
    belief that the group is not afraid to challenge central power when it is
    perceived as a threat to its interests.  Current governor Ausencio
Chavez and
    PRI candidate Victor Tinoco Rubi are considered members of this group.
    Thus, despite an appealing personal style, Tinoco Rubi is perceived to owe
    his designation as the official party candidate to the undemocratic
    elements in the state.

                Cristobal Aries and the PRD entered the gubernatorial race
    handicapped by an internal party conflict that was not resolved
    adequately until just a few weeks before the election.  The internal
    dispute over the selection of the party's candidate reinforced a
    public image of the PRD as a party of disorder and conflict -- an
    image created and projected with avid enthusiasm by the pro - PRI mass
    media and governmental authorities, notwithstanding the fact that the PRD
    has been the victimized of hundreds of political assassinations throughout
    Mexico since 1988. Under such a hostile environment the political offer
    made by the PRD and Arias was ignored by the mass media and did not
    reach the state's voters.  The party has been successful in establishing an
    impressive base of support in many regions of the state, relying on a
    peasant constituency.  It has become a majority force in nearly half of the
    state's municipalities. Overall, it can be regarded as a young party in the
    process of formation that remains at a disadvantage in the current context
    against a ruling party supported by resources of the state and dominant
    social groups.  It is also in an unfavorable position in the nation
against the
    PAN, a conservative party that has increased its appeal to the state's
urban
    middle class disenchanted with the continuing deterioration of the
quality of
    life in Michoacan.

                Felipe Calderon belongs to an old PAN family.  He has been
    groomed by the party to end the bipartisan character of Michoacan's
    electoral politics.  He has shown an ability to generate enthusiasm
    among voters and to provide large numbers of middle class voters to
    switch allegiance from the PRI.  This was evident in Ciudad Hidalgo,
    where the local PRI municipal president and the candidate designated
    to succeed him were received with displeasure by voters we met.  In
    this city and elsewhere, an important aspect of the PAN strategy was
     o develop campaigns emphasizing honesty, efficiency, and a commitment
    to economic development.  It has been the principal beneficiary at the
    national level of the economic crisis and the national decomposition
    was adopted and implemented by former president Carlos Salinas de
    Gorteri and his generation of neoliberals that continue to run the
    nation.  A strong presence in the Michoacan election reinforces the
    PAN's apparent plan to gain control of the Mexican Congress and
    Presidency in 1997 and 2000, respectively.

     The Bleeding Process : An Eye Witness Report

                Our presence in the Michoacan election situation for Nov.
12, 1995
    was facilitated by Alianza Civica, Michoacan, which provided an
    orientation session and assigned us to cover the electoral process in
    the municipalities of Ciudad Hidalgo and Zitacuaro in northeastern
    Michoacan, a region with a tradition of PRI domination.  The primary
    task was to examine events unfolding in casillas (polling place)
    selected as part of a state-wide sample designed by Alianza Civica to
    evaluate the elections.

                The casillas selected by Ted Lewis and Jesus Martinez were
    located in a working class neighborhood in Ciudad Hidalgo.  However,
    we were also encouraged to send some members of our delegation on a
    roaming mission to visit other casillas in communities with histories
    of electoral problems.  One of the five delegation members and Martinez
    expressed interest in carrying out such a task, thus the following report
    applies to events taking place in Ciudad Hidalgo as well as two other rural
    communities, La Venta and San Antonio Villalongin.

          1.  We arrived at about 8:30 am to the casilla number 0491
    located in the Jardin de Ninos Nueva Creacion, at Leandro Valle #170,
    we found not one but two casillas, a basica (regular) and an adjunta
    (or adjoining) casilla.

          2.  Neither opened at the scheduled 8:00 am starting time.  The
    adjunta opened at about 9:15 am, the basica several minutes later.

          3.  There was confusion on the part of casilla officials as to
the citizens
    each casilla was to cover.  The basica was listed as covering surnames with
    initials starting with "a" through "m", and the adjunta from "m" to
"z".  This
    created additional confusion among voters for most of the day.

         4.  The casilla officials committed other errors or mistakes
    during the course of the day that reflected an unfamiliarity with the
    procedures to be followed.  There was no apparent attempt on their
    part to be biased in their individual or collective behavior.  The
    three major parties in the state (PRI, PRD, PAN) were represented in
    both casillas.

          Significant errors observed during the day include: not carrying
    out an actual count, by hand, of the ballots received at the beginning
    of the session; not signing the ballots utilized in the electoral
    process; permitting an alternate PRI representative to be present at
    the desk for casilla officials for nearly half of the day; permitting
    for several hours a survey taker of the University of Guadalajara to
    approach exiting voters within the school ground and at a distance
    that may have violated electoral rules; closing the casilla basica at
    6:15 PM at a time when a voter continued voting and three or four
    adults had entered the classroom housing the casilla, but not allowing
    the latter to cast their votes; an unwillingness on the part of
    casilla officials to file an "inconformity" or protest act referring
    to events such as the exclusion of these voters.  Despite such errors
    no "acts of inconformity" were filed.

          5.  While the above list of problems are minor in significance,
    there were other troubling reports we received from representatives
    and sympathizers of opposition parties.

          Fabian Escovedo, a PAN representative who was examining events in
    several casillas, reported receiving information on several
    irregularities.  In Colonia Francisco Villa, uniformed police officers
    were seen voting in one casilla and then, without uniform, voting in
    another.  He received reports that an individual, Chano Villegas, who
    was former "Dirigente of Agua Potable" (director of potable water) was
    seen transporting six to eight voters to different casillas.  Villegas
    is described as an individual with a history of "electoral
    delinquency".  Escovedo also indicated at least one individual in the
    casilla we were observing had been "shaved off", (erased from) the
    voters list, and was not allowed to vote.  Escovedo also indicated he
    had received reports of illegal transportation of voters from casilla
    to casilla in red Nissan pickup truck.  Later in the evening he also
    indicated receiving additional information of other irregularities,
    but we did not have the opportunity to discuss them.

          Fidel Mar, a local resident who visited casillas throughout the
    city reported witnessing a calm process, but also received news of
    possible multiple voting taking place by public authorities,
    specifically police officers.

          Alvaro Maya, a local leader of the Partido de Trabajo (workers
    party) reported visiting some 16 casillas in the city, and detecting
    several irregularities.  In at least three casillas, he witnessed
    young people proselytizing in favor of the PAN, while people were
    waiting to cast their vote;  in the majority of the casillas that he
    visited, the ballots had not been counted by hand prior to the opening
    of the casilla;  six casillas were open an hour to an hour and a half
    late;  and he also reported seeing suspicious vehicles without license
    plates circulating the city.

          6.  We were also able to detect irregularities in the casilla
    #522, located in Escuela Felipe Angeles in the rural community of La
    Venta.  Upon our arrival to the casilla, we introduced ourselves to
    the officials and requested some information from them.  The casilla
    president, an indigenous woman who identified herself as the
    representative of the PRI, appeared to be illiterate and did not know
    how many voters were on the list or how many ballots were received.
    She referred our questions to a blond, middle class looking woman, who
    appeared to be directing the process in the casilla.  The grouping of
    people near the officials' desk also created an environment
    potentially conducive to voter intimidation, in our opinion.  This
    worrisome situation was further confirmed by another our delegation,
    Cecilia Sanchez, who remained in the casilla with another U.S. observer

    and witnessed the familiarity of the "presidenta" of the casilla with the
    electoral process.  According to Cecilia Sanchez, our two observers were
    also harassed and verbally attacked by a University of Guadalajara survey
    taker, who accused them of violating electoral laws.  According to the
    survey taker, they had no right to be present at the casilla without
    official accreditation and she assumed the authority to publicly
    denounce them, creating a scandal that drew the attention of local
    residents.

         7. In a brief mid-day visit to a casilla in Escuela Primaria
     Educacion y Patria in the community of San Antonio Villalongin, we
     witnessed a calm electoral process. However, at two other casillas
     located in the town's government building there was a concentration of
     people near the casillas, also creating a possibly intimidating
     environment for voters coming to cast their vote. In a conversation
     with a PAN representative also inspecting casillas in this part of the
     municipio he reported receiving no news of serious irregularities.


     A Concluding Assessment

         The November 12 election in Michoacan became a focal point of the
     debate over democratic reform in Mexico. The election revealed the
     continuing unfairness of the electoral process and a perpetuation of
     the structures of power that concentrate influence in the Torres Manzo
     group. The permanence of this group in power comes at a time when
     there is increasing attention being paid to  calls for the development
     of a truly federalist system that would grant greater powers to the
     state and local governments.

         The PRI/Torres Manzo victory also arrives at a time when Roberto
     Madrazo in Tabasco, Manuel Bartlett in Puebla, and Ruben Figueroa in
     Guerrero, among other governors and political forces, have resisted
     the central government's calls for even modest reforms. They have
     shown signs of authoritarianism and intolerance for opposition forces.
     Their success to date was based on President Zedillo's weakness and
     his reliance on them for political support. This reality creates
     limits on any plans to carry out a significant reform of
     the state.

         Many analysts have pointed out that democracy is not an inevitable
     outcome of the difficult process Mexico is undergoing. The nation is
     facing a generalized crisis in which even rumors of a military coup
     de stabilize an already decimated economy and a conflict-ridden
     political system that is accumulating numerous unresolved problems,
     ranging from indigenous insurgencies to political assassinations and
     the unchallenged influence of former president Carlos Salinas de
     Gortari.

         The emergence of the PAN has altered the relations of power in the
     political arena in Michoacan. The conservative party has divided the
     vote and made it impossible for any party to claim support of even
     half of the electorate. In order to govern and govern well it will be
     necessary to establish alliances. It remains to be seen whether this
     realignment leads to substantive social, economic, and political
     improvements in the state.

    Preliminary results (courtesy of Equipo Pueblo)

        On Sunday, November 12, elections were carried out in six
    states and the Federal District (in Mexico City).  Most of
    the elections were held without major incidents, although in
    Oaxaca violence broke out in several areas.  In general, the
    National Action Party (PAN) gained significant ground,
    including the mayor's office in the capitals of Michoacan,
    Puebla, Oaxaca, and Sinaloa.  The Institutional
    Revolutionary Party (PRI) lost important seats, but has
    apparently won the only gubernatorial election - in
    Michoacan.  The PRD had some significant wins - especially
    municipalities in Michoacan and Oaxaca - but also suffered
    major losses.

        With 75% of the votes counted in Michoacan (the only state
    holding a gubernatorial election) the PRI candidate, Victor
    Manuel Tinoco Rubi has claimed victory with 38.6%.  The PRD
    (31.3% of votes) and the PAN (26.8%) candidates have said
    they will not concede until all the votes are counted.

        In Puebla, where the governor, Manuel Bartlett, was accused
    of openly supporting PRI candidates with state money, the
    PAN has won the capital and at least 23 municipalities.  A
    "technical error" has delayed the reporting of the results,
    leading to speculation that there would be fraud.  (Manuel
    Bartlett was the Interior Secretary in charge of the Federal
    Electoral Institute in 1988 during the fraudulent
    presidential elections). (La Jornada, Reforma, 13-14
    November)

        In Oaxaca, 405 of the 570 municipal leaders had already been
    chosen in traditional indigenous assemblies referred to as
    "Uses and Customs".  In some of the other 165 municipalities
    that held political party elections, violence broke out .
    Three people were killed:  Elias Garcia Ortega, a PRI member
    and election official; Jose Luis Cortes, a member of the
    Indian Organization for Human Rights; and Alberto Antonio
    Calderon, the brother of the PRD candidate in Asuncion
    Ixtalepec.  Another five people were seriously wounded.  The
    elections were suspended in 23 municipalities due to the
    violence.  (Reforma, 13 November)

    Extremely Low Turnout Taints Citizen Councils

        Less than 15% of the electorate turned out to vote for
    "Citizen Advisors" in the Federal District.  This enormous
    abstention rate was due to a widespread belief that the new
    post was a farce, primarily because political parties
    couldn't openly participate, so voters had no way of knowing
    for sure their political tendencies; and the councils won't
    have significant decision-making power, they are advisors.

        Unfortunately, these elections in Mexico City were a very costly
    experiment: 268,493 new pesos (about US $38,356) were spent on the election
    the 365 new advisors.  (La Jornada/Reforma, 13 November).

    More Results

        Global Exchange will send a complete breakdown of the voting
    tendencies throughout Michoacan as soon as it is available.